Science Material Evaluation Summary Comments

1-30-02

 

FOSS

 

Strengths/Positives

-          Developmentally appropriate

-          Expand single concept

-          3 yr. Field test with invoice teachers

-          Unit set-up:      K-2 individual

3-6 Collaborative/teams

                        (Again - developmentally sound)

-          Binder for teachers manual

-          Activity based, follow-up with ISAT success

-          Support with newsletter, web site as needed

-          Professional development (free of charge)

-          96% - 98% materials covers ISAT

-          Units can correspond multi-age

-          Open-ended approach with video support

-          Activities essential to program

-          Allow teachers to utilize before purchasing decision made

-          Assessment variety (formative and summative)

-          Home-School extension

-          Average cost of kit refill - $27.00

-          Integration with other subjects (ex-weekly math problem, social studies, writing, art)

-          Comprehension skills - vocabulary, information learned, graphic organizers

-          Video - provides support for teacher

-          Limited number of resources are easier to manage.

-          High motivation - promotes “fun”

-          Students construct own learning

-          Inquiry based

-          Other schools utilizing: Davenport

-          Unit requires development of higher order thinking.

-          Potential for success for more needy children and consistency between buildings.


FOSS

 

Areas of Concern/Cautions

 

-         Need for person to manage materials - probably building level, not district level

-         Requires lots of storage space

-         Need to decide how to divide by grade level to address district mobility

-         Management of shared units (scheduling)

-         Lack of textbook reduces support for content area reading

-         Need some alignment so it is not “haphazard” and dialogue with junior high

-         Requiring individuals to collect own supplies (e.g., crayfish) might inadvertently give staff permission to not follow program

-         Constant - high activity, hands-on


McGraw/Hill

 

Strengths/Positives

 

-          National Geographic link

-          Diagrams, visuals in materials extremely good

-          Balance of approaches, variety

-          Trade books - strong selling point, leveled, useful in 4-block, balanced literacy

-          Provide resources for integrating in primary

-          Supports reading program

-          Quality - durable big books

-          Technology - many resources

-          Grades 3-6 interactive videos

-          Connections to stories, people in science

-          Stand-alone units

-          Ease in integration to other areas - math, social studies

-          Staff development provided - as long as we need it, multiple years

-          Lots of evaluation assessment choices - performance assessment

-          Introduction of unit with activity

-          Lots of choices of activities

-          Materials easily accessible not as costly as others.  Provide purchasing list to committee for supply orders

-          Meaty reading content concepts; vocabulary

-          Grade/age-appropriate reading

-          2-page design of text support initial question.  (Ease in student use)

-          Shows lots of people in science and their involvement

-          Provides comfort for teachers with different backgrounds, experience levels

-          Reading, passages brief, non-threatening


McGraw/Hill

 

Areas of Concern/Cautions

 

-          Lack of home connection for ESL

-          Reading concepts seem advanced in some areas (ex - geology - 5th grade)

-          Not all photos seem to correspond to text

-          Materials, ordering by fax from Texas

-          Discussed supporting disproving hypothesis

-          Use of video after exploring activity could limit kids idea of procedure

-          Many add-ons could be costly

-          Book based - not activity based

-          Brief passages might not be enriching enough


Houghton Mifflin

 

Strengths/Positives

 

-          Good match to standards

-          Magic School Bus, Bill Nye resources

-          Technology a plus

-          Relationship strong with our language arts program

-          Custom design own books, units

-          Link to AIMS correlation

-          Baseline assessment and follow through

-          Simple & powerful assessments

-          Assessments for multiple learning styles

-          Highlighted “essentials” of instruction

-          Open-endedness

-          Trade books - good variety

-          Scientific method of inquiry theme throughout levels

-          Safety goggles for each student

-          Tool box in student materials encourages student participation

-          Science Fair link on web site

-          Materials easily accessible

-          Strong link/match of materials to our reading program


Houghton Mifflin

 

Areas of Concern/Cautions

 

-          Trade books not really leveled, more resource materials

-          Teachers edition a bit difficult to follow - so much provided that it can make planning a bit tricky

-          Cost of supplementary materials

-          Many kit choices made decisions difficult - some confusion